Re: gac experiment

[Christophe Kalt <kalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 02, Diane Bruce wrote:
|   TimeStamp and Nick Delay/Channel Delay have both been dismal failures.

i don't know about TS, but the Delay stuff hasn't been a
failure, as long as one remembers the goal.
They've both dramatically improved things, buying us time to
do better.  This is pretty good, especially considering how
simple they were to put in place.

i don't think they were ever presented as an ultimate solution.

!channels on the other hand might be a failure; or may be
they simply prove that users don't want takeover free
channels.
unlike many, i don't claim to know what users want, and i'm
still trying to figure that one out.