Re: ideas to improve ircnet (was: where are we heading to)

[Magnus Tjernstrom <d92-mtm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Thomas Kuiper wrote:

[...]
> well, sure a service could do it (but there is already a webinterface
> who is nearly like this), and people wont you use it (I think).
[...]

http://www.ludd.luth.se/irc/list.html has been accessed:

Timeperiod                                 Hits
---------------------------------------+-------
17/10-96 02:34:03 -- 04/12-96 03:34:39      380
04/12-96 03:40:22 -- 06/12-96 06:24:28       36
06/12-96 06:26:28 -- 18/12-97 11:59:14    28587
18/12-97 12:00:28 -- 17/03-99 17:44:14    41458
===============================================
17/10-96 02:34:03 -- 17/03-99 17:44:14    70461

Guess some people use it... I guess more would if they
knew about it as well. It is a nicer way of having the
data presented, really. Unfortunately I didn't think
of keeping access logs to the web service (the current
version is 2) earlier.
I only log hits and not actual searches - so I dont know
for sure how many that really performs a search). Since
many of the other pages are hopelessly _not_ up to date,
it would surprize me that everyone surfs in without
doing a search.

  /Magnus Tjernström  (Core@IRC - Admin for irc.ludd.luth.se)