RE: who-stacking

[Thomas Kuiper <engerim@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah!

watch your tongue koala boy. He didn't make RFC 1459 so he can surely
blame it on others. Besides its always people like you who scare people
like Christophe away from development...

Request for Comments: 2810                                   April 2000
Updates: 1459
^^^^^^^^
Category: Informational


so long,
Thomas

On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Zero wrote:

> 'lousy "features"'
> 'lousy implementation'
> 'poorly scalable protocol'
> 
> This coming from the person who wrote 2813, and from the person who was for
> a long time the lead dev of irc2.10?
> 
> --Zero, Akashra@IRCnet
> IRC Operator, flute.telstra.net.au
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ircd-users@xxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ircd-users@xxxxxxx]On
> > Behalf Of Christophe Kalt
> > Sent: Thursday November 2, 2000 01:56
> > To: ircd-users@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: who-stacking
> >
> >
> > On Nov 01, Axel Franke wrote:
> > | It exists already clients/bots the on basis this stacking the code
> > | have. In the irc-rfc I found only, that stacking is allowed, but not
> > | this limit for the who-command. If such a client/bot to such a server
> > | connectet, this code does not work, I think this is a serverbug and
> > | not a clientbug.
> >
> > section 5.8 of RFC 2813 discusses this very briefly and
> > rather vaguely (on purpose).
> >
> > such lousy "features" are merely the result of a lousy
> > implementation of a poorly scalable protocol.  if either of
> > these were significantly improved, one could get rid of these
> > limitations.
> >
> 
> 
>