RE: who-stacking

["Zero" <zero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

'lousy "features"'
'lousy implementation'
'poorly scalable protocol'

This coming from the person who wrote 2813, and from the person who was for
a long time the lead dev of irc2.10?

--Zero, Akashra@IRCnet
IRC Operator, flute.telstra.net.au

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ircd-users@xxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ircd-users@xxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Christophe Kalt
> Sent: Thursday November 2, 2000 01:56
> To: ircd-users@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: who-stacking
>
>
> On Nov 01, Axel Franke wrote:
> | It exists already clients/bots the on basis this stacking the code
> | have. In the irc-rfc I found only, that stacking is allowed, but not
> | this limit for the who-command. If such a client/bot to such a server
> | connectet, this code does not work, I think this is a serverbug and
> | not a clientbug.
>
> section 5.8 of RFC 2813 discusses this very briefly and
> rather vaguely (on purpose).
>
> such lousy "features" are merely the result of a lousy
> implementation of a poorly scalable protocol.  if either of
> these were significantly improved, one could get rid of these
> limitations.
>