[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: !-Channels and the +a Flag
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 06:56:11PM +0200, Vesa Ruokonen wrote:
> Wrong guess. The goal with &channels was to provide anonymity
> to messages, but not to channel membership. There are bigger
???
> problems in trying to make membership anonymous.
Which are?
> Please allow -a on !channels.
+a is useless if -a is possible.
--
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Michael 'Eumel' Neumayer <Michael.Neumayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Eumel@IRC ! LinuX inside ! pgp-key available |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+