Re: anonymous channels bug ?

[Matus fantomas Uhlar <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

-> > further thoughts about this have brought us to the conclusion
-> > that we should drop the anonymous channel flag for now.
-> 
-> ...Or just add up a temporary fix that may later be changed into
-> a more working one. I definitely think +a channels should NOT be
-> dropped. 

agreed.

-> Hrm. One can't just drop  off oldie  features  because of recent
-> trouble implementing fixes for them, IMO. Users  can't even  set
-> +q or anything, anyway.

agreed.

-> > | a simple workaround is to have the server issue PARTs for the
-> > | client leaving.  This is far from perfect.

I think this workaround is good enough and when any1 cares about anonymity,
sholud leacve and then quit
or, is it so hard to send anonymous quit message to channel when it's +a ?
-- 
 Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, sysadmin at Telenor Internet Kosice, Slovakia
 BIC coord for *.sk; admin of netlab.irc.sk; co-admin of irc.felk.cvut.cz
 WinError #98652: Operation completed successfully.