Re: anonymous channels bug ?

[Christophe Kalt <kalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

further thoughts about this have brought us to the conclusion
that we should drop the anonymous channel flag for now.

On Jul 17, Christophe Kalt wrote:
| On Jul 16, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
| | Hello,
| | i checked anonymous channel behaviour with 2 clients and I see users on
| | anonymous channel see full nick!user@host of someone who quits +a channel.
| | Do you think that's ok ?
| 
| no. :)
| 
| anonymous channels suffer from so many problems that it isn't
| even funny.
| i have allowed it for users because i figured it may be
| useful in some way, but i often regret this as people tend to
| trust +a a lot more than they should.
| 
| a simple workaround is to have the server issue PARTs for the
| client leaving.  This is far from perfect.
|