Re: thoughts on new modes (Ie)

[Q <Q@xxxxxxx>]

Saso wrote:
> <question>
> Both modes are of course really useful and i bet we all will use it quite
> a lot in our every-week chatting on irc, but how do they behave when a
> split (not that i would see some lately, but still, let's leave it open)
> occurs and one side has +I for certain host and other side has that host
> banned? I apologize if this has been discussed over before, it just came
> to my exhausted mind.
> </question>
> 
> One simple thought tho. It would be nice, if +I/+e could NOT be altered
> within few seconds/minutes after the netmerge occured, just to prevent
> more help such modes could give to accidental takeovers (we all know those
> are purely accidental, right?).
> 

You probably mean +e in the question and not +I ... +I and +b are not
related, you can be +b and +I at the same time. You still need either a
-b, +e or an invite to join.

If you do not allow a +e, unless their is a +b for it, you can't have
this problem. With other words, 1 side can't have a +e for the +b on the
other, without having a +b that matches it too.

anyway, I don't see your problem, maybe you should sleep some more :)

btw: what about setting +e *!*@* ?


Q