[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: thoughts on new modes (Ie)

To: Christophe Kalt <kalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: thoughts on new modes (Ie)
From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Nov 1998 20:58:47 +0100
Cc: ircd-users@xxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ircd-users-out@irc.org
Delivered-to: ircd-users@irc.org
In-reply-to: Samuel Tardieu's message of "25 Nov 1998 20:56:55 +0100"
Organization: Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications
References: <19981125142011.A1059@stealth.net> <8790gzh7g8.fsf@zaphod.enst.fr>
Reply-to: Samuel Tardieu <sam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.070054 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.54) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia)

Christophe> * +e entries are removed once they no longer match a
Christophe> current ban

Sam> What is the cost of computing this? If you have 9 +b left and 10
Sam> +e, it seems to me that in the worst case you may have 90 matches
Sam> to test. This may become even more costly if in the future those
Sam> limits get raised (to say 20) to adapt to the growing userbase.

Thinking more about this, you can also keep two bitmaps by channel to
remember which ban matches which +e and vice-versa, and keep the cost
and space reasonable.

  Sam
-- 
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@xxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- thoughts on new modes (Ie)
  - From: Christophe Kalt
- Re: thoughts on new modes (Ie)
  - From: Samuel Tardieu

Prev by Date: Re: thoughts on new modes (Ie)
Next by Date: Re: thoughts on new modes (Ie)
Previous by thread: Re: thoughts on new modes (Ie)
Next by thread: Re: thoughts on new modes (Ie)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread