[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Demand of RFC

To: skaabi <skaabi@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Demand of RFC
From: Christophe Kalt <kalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:58:31 -0400
Cc: ircd-users <ircd-users@xxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ircd-users-out@irc.org
Delivered-to: ircd-users@irc.org
In-reply-to: <20021014184539.A2706@ping.be>; from Q@ping.be on Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:45:39PM +0200
Mail-followup-to: skaabi <skaabi@voila.fr>, ircd-users <ircd-users@irc.org>
References: <H3Z6E8$B8DE592533AA6FDA925A1C1F971FB261@voila.fr> <20021014184539.A2706@ping.be>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Oct 14, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
| On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 04:18:08PM +0200, skaabi wrote:
| > Would you please send me the RFC2811and RFC2810.
| > 
| > 
| > The doc. available on the internet are not lisible .
| >  Best regards,
| 
| What does "lisible" mean?

s/he means legible.

Safa,

If you having problems with getting RFCs, you should try a
different source, as it is quite unlikely that any RFC would
not be legible.  Previous posters suggested several locations.
If none work, then you should be looking at a problem on your
side.

References:
- Demand of RFC
  - From: skaabi
- Re: Demand of RFC
  - From: Kurt Roeckx

Prev by Date: Re: Demand of RFC
Next by Date: Home made gpav
Previous by thread: Re: Demand of RFC
Next by thread: Re: Demand of RFC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread