Re: Extensions to the protocol.

[Michal Svoboda <pht@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 03:23:14PM -0500, Christophe Kalt wrote:
> On Nov 17, Michal Svoboda wrote:
> | I think it would be a good idea to extend the server to server
> | protocol and/or behavior to fully support non-homogenous networks.
> 
> (define non-homogenous.)

Perhaps not a perfect term for what i meant. 'Slightly more upwards
compatible' would fit better.

> protocol isn't the only thing that matters when you want to
> conect two servers.  their behaviour and handling of certain
> events, as well as channels is critical because each server
> assumes that other servers will behave in a certain way.

I agree that certain things are critical, but another host of them
might be not.


pht