[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: STARTTLS and ircd

To: ircd-users@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: STARTTLS and ircd
From: Helmut Springer <delta@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 21:27:34 +0100
Delivered-to: ircd-users-out@irc.org
Delivered-to: ircd-users@irc.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002152110360.31054-100000@fire2.tobit.com>; from engerim@engerim.de on Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 09:12:52PM +0100
Organization: *.de IRCNet
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002152106270.27972-100000@cyberspace.mht.bme.hu> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002152110360.31054-100000@fire2.tobit.com>

> that was the main idea about it :) server<->server doesn't make much sense
> imho since they already can use "kinda secure" zip links, and you always
server-server is a long time connection so it's mostly fast symmetrical
crypting I'd really like to have.

I like the idea to have only to trust the server's admin (that might be
only me btw) and not everything in between.

-- 
MfG/best regards, helmut springer
                                                         delta@xxxxxxxxxx
	
                   "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose"

References:
- Re: STARTTLS and ircd
  - From: Greg Budai
- Re: STARTTLS and ircd
  - From: Thomas Kuiper

Prev by Date: Re: STARTTLS and ircd
Next by Date: Re: STARTTLS and ircd
Previous by thread: Re: STARTTLS and ircd
Next by thread: Re: STARTTLS and ircd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread