[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: STARTTLS and ircd

To: ircd-users@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: STARTTLS and ircd
From: Helmut Springer <delta@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 21:12:22 +0100
Delivered-to: ircd-users-out@irc.org
Delivered-to: ircd-users@irc.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002152045050.29850-100000@fire2.tobit.com>; from engerim@engerim.de on Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 09:09:48PM +0100
Organization: *.de IRCNet
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002152045050.29850-100000@fire2.tobit.com>

hi,

On Tue 2000-02-15 (21:09), Thomas Kuiper wrote:
> I write a SSL extension for the ircd using OpenSSL (which is the most
nice

> ... At any point during the connection. A fallback to a non-secure
> connection is not possible.
why not adding a flag to allow/deny a fallback allowing to make TLS
optional?

-- 
MfG/best regards, helmut springer
                                                         delta@xxxxxxxxxx
	
                   "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: STARTTLS and ircd
  - From: Helmut Springer
- Re: STARTTLS and ircd
  - From: Thomas Kuiper

References:
- STARTTLS and ircd
  - From: Thomas Kuiper

Prev by Date: Re: STARTTLS and ircd
Next by Date: Re: STARTTLS and ircd
Previous by thread: Re: STARTTLS and ircd
Next by thread: Re: STARTTLS and ircd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread