[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LUSERS

To: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <Mario.Holbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LUSERS
From: Thomas Kuiper <engerim@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 22:27:24 +0100 (MET)
Cc: ircd-users@xxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ircd-users-out@irc.org
Delivered-to: ircd-users@irc.org
In-reply-to: <20000205222216.V13939@rubens>

On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:

> RFC defines numeric AND detailed reply string and clients depend on it.
> This is the reason, why RFC 1459 servers cannot be localized.
> No better reason needed.
> We should not break RFC, if we don't really need it.
> And it might make sense, if u'd read (and understand) RFC at least.

again, its not really a problem of RFC, if it would we would have
already breaken it about the "invisible" thing. And yes I understand
RFC, checkout the other RFC's how syntaxes are described, in this case
its no problem and won't break it.

Engerim

References:
- Re: LUSERS
  - From: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe

Prev by Date: Re: LUSERS
Next by Date: Re: LUSERS
Previous by thread: Re: LUSERS
Next by thread: Re: LUSERS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread