Re: /who mask

[wnelson <wnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matus \"fantomas\" Uhlar wrote:
> 
> HEllo,
> 
> as long as /list was not enhanced to process channel masks due to
> performance of ircd, the /who command could be also changed by something
> more simple and it's functionality replaced by service.
> 
> Opinions ?

How about changing /names and /who so that they must accept at least
one parameter? Typed on their own, the resulting flood of information is
IMO of no use to anyone really (and often just results in the client
being disconnected).

/who and /names do seem much more useful when given channels as their
parameters.

Wull