[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: your mail
- To: Subhi S Hashwa <subhi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: your mail
- From: Thomas Kuiper <engerim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:58:57 +0200 (MEST)
- Cc: ircd-users@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: ircd-users-out@irc.org
- Delivered-to: ircd-users@irc.org
- In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.19990902093722.007b2aa0@mail.u-net.com>
I know many flames will start on this topic, so move the discussion
to ircd-users please :-)
He's right that a "hiding" algorithm should be there, but
I think its hard to implement. I dont like it either but
would be nice for the people who are tired of smurf and other
TCP/IP attacks.
Greets,
Engerim
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Subhi S Hashwa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I know this might be too latet plan to add to ircd 2.11. but what do you
> think.
> With nick collisions eliminated from ircnet, people are going to start
> looking for new ways to attack and takeover channels, so I think one of the
> ways they will do it is to attack channel users directly. By icmp, smurf ,
> whatever.
>
> I know this is not a new idea, but nevertheless I think it will be a good
> addon to ircnet , especially with the high ratio of idiots we have.
>
> User is NickName!ident@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> sets mode +h nickname (Stands for Hidden)
>
> becomes User is NickName!ident@user-id x server-id.host.com
>
> Only opers on local server can see the real ip
>
> bans wont be a problem because then you can ban people using a certain
> server too. DCC shouldnt be affected. and @host.com domain will be changed
> to @uidXsid.host.com
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> -Subhi
> InfraRed
> Error 203. G:\shared\usr\.pgp\.signature not found.
>
>