[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mode +k
- To: Donald Quixote VI <holeekow@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: mode +k
- From: Christophe Kalt <kalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 20:51:25 -0500
- Cc: ircd-users@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: ircd-users-out@irc.org
- Delivered-to: ircd-users@irc.org
- In-reply-to: <3.0.5.16.19980215154627.2fef9fd6@pop.flash.net>; from Donald Quixote VI on Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 03:46:27PM -0500
- Mail-followup-to: Donald Quixote VI <holeekow@flash.net>, ircd-users@irc.org
- References: <3.0.5.16.19980215154627.2fef9fd6@pop.flash.net>
On Feb 15, Donald Quixote VI wrote:
| I understand that on some nets, maybe undernet, ircu?, that info on the
| channel key is restricted to ops only.
|
| This would be a great improvement of the public key..
|
| With only ops being able to view the key if set, the room could be kept
| functionsl while some abusers are locked out without non-ops being able to
| pass the key to undewsirables. basically like invites are restricted to
| ops only.. only ops could give out the key..
I don't think I like the idea.
If you know the key, enter then you should be able to still
see it. If you really want to have opers control who enters
the channel then I think +i is appropriate.