Re: Anonymous mode for !-channels

[Michal *pht* Svoboda <svobodam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Christophe Kalt wrote:

> On Dec 09, Michael Neumayer wrote:
> | So better don't allow +a at all. It's good for abuse. *Nothing* else.
> 
> I don't share this point of view.
> 
> On Dec 09, Michael Neumayer wrote:
> | On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 10:54:57AM -0500, Christophe Kalt wrote:
> | > the reasons I have to forbid +a on #channels don't apply to
> 
> s/s// & s/don/doesn/
> 
> | > !channels, and because of the restriction that the mode may
> | > only be set (and only by the creator).
> | 
> | Technical reasons. But what about the non-technical reasons?
> 
> I disabled +a on #channels before 2.9.1 came out only
> because it would have been very disruptive.
> there's nothing disruptive about +a by creator on !channel.
> (-a is a different story)
> 
technically disruptive?