Re: Anonymous mode for !-channels

[Christophe Kalt <kalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 09, Michael Neumayer wrote:
| So better don't allow +a at all. It's good for abuse. *Nothing* else.

I don't share this point of view.

On Dec 09, Michael Neumayer wrote:
| On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 10:54:57AM -0500, Christophe Kalt wrote:
| > the reasons I have to forbid +a on #channels don't apply to

s/s// & s/don/doesn/

| > !channels, and because of the restriction that the mode may
| > only be set (and only by the creator).
| 
| Technical reasons. But what about the non-technical reasons?

I disabled +a on #channels before 2.9.1 came out only
because it would have been very disruptive.
there's nothing disruptive about +a by creator on !channel.
(-a is a different story)