Re: invites

["Genady" <lucky@xxxxxxxx>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Ville <viha@xxxxxx>
To: Kaspar Landsberg <kl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ircd-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <ircd-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, 24 March 1998 10:28
Subject: Re: invites


>
>Hmm. I wonder if I am the only one with the opinion of not making it
>override +b. But overriding +l/k would imho make sense. What do people
>think about the +k overriding? Do you think it comes naturally with the
>overriding of +b or that it shouldn't override +k ..or ?
>
You're not the only one ;)
I'm sure, that invite overriding +b is a bad idea.

Unlike modes, invites are not seen on the channel, so noone on the channel
ever knows, how did it happen that the banned person joined the channel -
from split, from desync or from invite.

If you want to override +b - make a mode +e (or call it whatever you like) -
an exception from banlist.

Anway I don't understand the reason why would someone want a banned person
to override ban ?

Overriding +l and +k is a good idea.

>
>> Kaspar Landsberg, <kl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>- Ville/viha@xxxxxx
>

LuckySt@IRCNet (irc.lvnet.lv, irc.estpak.ee)