[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unique IDs (Re: TS (Re: RFC: OP cheating))

To: ircd-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: unique IDs (Re: TS (Re: RFC: OP cheating))
From: Christophe Kalt <kalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 15:13:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980318163406.19856R-100000@trouble.concentric.net>; from Chris Behrens on Wed, Mar 18, 1998 at 04:39:40PM -0800
Mail-followup-to: ircd-users@stealth.net
References: <19980318081046.12233@stealth.net> <Pine.GSO.3.96.980318163406.19856R-100000@trouble.concentric.net>

On Mar 18, Chris Behrens wrote:
| Yep...having a unique ID assigned manually could be a pain, but, at
| the same time, it forces a network to have some sort of organization.
| Instead of everyone and their mother adding servers here and there.

agreed.

| IMHO, Undernet messed up by limiting server ids to max of 64.

oh, now i remember this "detail".

| I'm not sure...i can't remember the emails very well...but Roger
| is the one who brought it up, I think...

it's part of TS4.. yeah

References:
- unique IDs (Re: TS (Re: RFC: OP cheating))
  - From: Christophe Kalt
- Re: unique IDs (Re: TS (Re: RFC: OP cheating))
  - From: Chris Behrens

Prev by Date: Bquiet
Next by Date: Re: Bquiet
Previous by thread: Re: unique IDs (Re: TS (Re: RFC: OP cheating))
Next by thread: Re: RFC: OP cheating
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread