[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: killpath

On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 03:53:11PM +0100, Francesco Messineo wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Michal Svoboda wrote:
> 
> > Francesco Messineo wrote:
> > > yes, in order to track abusive admins and/or hacked servers.
> > 
> > Why don't we have a SQUIT path then?
> 
> probably because /squit's aren't that common. Also an abusive admin can
> fake collisions, so you probably want to quickly track a suspicious
> set of collisions.
> 
> F
maybe just include first server which has the the server which generated the kill connected.
JV