Re: Extensions to the protocol.

[Kurt Roeckx <Q@xxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 06:06:46PM +0100, Michal Svoboda wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 05:41:12PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Allowing them to pass might result in errors, for instance if
> > changes the state of an "object".  Not all server would know
> > about it but should, and things like that.
> 
> By passing the information we archieve less desynchronised state than
> by just ignoring it. I.e. by passing unknown channel mode +e we won't
> create "islands" within the same network which can contain different
> +e channel modes.

This doesn't happen right now because the other server does not
now if "+e" takes an argument or not.  If it doesn't take one, it
will use the next paramter as more modes to be set.

mode +t n, will set both +t and +n. Mode parsing is something
weird :)


Kurt