ban desync

["Rico \"mc\" Gloeckner" <mc@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

heya, 

this happened tonight...


/mode #linux.de b
  34 #linux.de  unknown        0  *!*none@*.colt.net
  35 #linux.de  unknown        0  *!*Frami@*.01019freenet.de
  36 #linux.de  unknown        0  *!*Sunny@*.t-ipconnect.de
  37 #linux.de  unknown        0  *!*@*.cyberhome.de
  38 #linux.de  unknown        0  *!*@*.96.149.167.host.de.colt.net
  39 #linux.de  unknown        0  *!*@*.aol.com
  40 #linux.de  unknown        0  *!*@*.eggdrops.net
  41 #linux.de  unknown        0  *!*@*.webbernet.net
  42 #linux.de  unknown        0  *!*@*viaginterkom.de
  43 #linux.de  unknown        0  *submuffi!*@*
  44 #linux.de  unknown        0  *korn*!*@*
  45 #linux.de  unknown        0  *!*root@*
  368 Total Number of Bans on #linux.de [45]
/mode #linux.de -b *!*none@*.colt.net
  000 mode/#linux.de [-b *!*none@*.colt.net] by mc-
/mode #linux.de +b *!*@*.colt.net
  1  #linux.de  unknown        0  *!*@*.96.149.167.host.de.colt.net
  000 SJ [~none@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #linux.de
/mode #linux.de -b *!*@*.96.149.167.host.de.colt.net
  000 mode/#linux.de [-b *!*@*.96.149.167.host.de.colt.net] by mc-
/mode #linux.de +b *!*@*.colt.net
  000 mode/#linux.de [+b *!*@*.colt.net] by mc-

...
Now how could this happen? Simple. Two ops on different servers tried to
ban the same person with different masks. So every ban got only set until
a specific server and then rejected because of redundance (right written?
(:)

The only solution i can think of, is to allow server-links to set an
redundant ban. 

--mc
(Rico Gloeckner  [*mc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(Newnet)] [mc-@iRCNet])
// mc@xxxxxxxxxxx // mc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx // mc@xxxxxxxxxxx //
// Fido: Rico Gloeckner@2:2444/1112.16 // ZC: ukeer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx //