Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: nick collide prevention ideas]]]

[Christophe Kalt <kalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 06, m de`jour wrote:
| I would not be judgemental and challenge such a philosophy.

but you are.

|                                                              But if in fact
| that is the "official" intent, then don't be hypocritical about it.  Bring on
| equality.  Remove +o modes.  Reduce all channels to +channel levels.  Powers
| given to channel ops are de facto vestages of "ownership", the ability to
| operate, control and dictate.

your choice of vocabulary once more shows how close you are
to the troublemakers you find infantile.

being chanop doesn't mean you own the channel.

[lots of rambling deleted, unread]

let's keep posts to this list focused on what this list is
about: the IRC server version 2.9.x and 2.10.x