[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: invite overriding ban notice
- To: ircd-users@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: invite overriding ban notice
- From: Christophe Kalt <kalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 08:07:36 -0400
- Delivered-to: ircd-users-out@irc.org
- Delivered-to: ircd-users@irc.org
- In-reply-to: <19990610000130.G2722@ruscdrom.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>; from Helmut Springer on Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 12:01:30AM +0200
- Mail-followup-to: ircd-users@irc.org
- References: <19990609234453.F2722@ruscdrom.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <375EE292.6A5A@ping.be> <19990610000130.G2722@ruscdrom.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
On Jun 10, Helmut Springer wrote:
| how abut sending a notice as for a mode change if someone issues an
| invitation overriding a ban? of course it could be issued before that
| ban is set, so always send it?
sending notices like this is really ugly and kludgy, and i
do not want to encourage such thing.
it's the same old problem.. how do yo know who invited
someone on a +i channel? you don't.
As many probably recall, this feature was briefly discussed
on ircd-users before i added it into the server. At the time
(April 1998), about half the people thought it'd be great,
and the other half thought it'd be awful.
the fact alone that I had to add such a kludge was probably a
bad sign i should have paid attention to.
Anyway, 2.10 has been around for quite a while now, and it's
probably a good idea to poll the list again and see what
people feel.
"It was an interesting experiment; has it failed? should we
revert the change and not have chanop /invite override bans?"
I tend to think so.