[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VER 2.9.4 & Y2K COMPLIANCY.

To: ROBERT_MCMAHON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: VER 2.9.4 & Y2K COMPLIANCY.
From: Christophe Kalt <kalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 08:44:46 -0400
Cc: ircd-users@xxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ircd-users-out@irc.org
Delivered-to: ircd-users@irc.org
In-reply-to: <H0000dc6070f7d4e@MHS>; from ROBERT_MCMAHON@HP-Australia-om4.om.hp.com on Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 11:05:35AM +1000
Mail-followup-to: ROBERT_MCMAHON@HP-Australia-om4.om.hp.com, ircd-users@irc.org
References: <H0000dc6070f7d4e@MHS>

Only versions 2.10.x are y2k compliant.

On Apr 27, ROBERT_MCMAHON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
| Have been looking for some information re the Y2K compliancy of the above 
| version of s/w.
| 
| Can you pls. supply me with info re the compliancy of this product or an URL 
| with the relevant data.

References:
- VER 2.9.4 & Y2K COMPLIANCY.
  - From: ROBERT_MCMAHON

Prev by Date: VER 2.9.4 & Y2K COMPLIANCY.
Next by Date: what about this
Previous by thread: VER 2.9.4 & Y2K COMPLIANCY.
Next by thread: what about this
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread