[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Current PING/PONG implementation to violate the RFC

To: ircd-users@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Current PING/PONG implementation to violate the RFC
From: Volker Paulsen <paulsen@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 12:56:50 +0100
Delivered-to: ircd-users-out@irc.org
Delivered-to: ircd-users@irc.org
In-reply-to: <19990209220552.A3444@enterprise.kl.de>; from Kaspar Landsberg on Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 10:05:52PM +0100
References: <19990209220552.A3444@enterprise.kl.de>

On Feb 09, 1999 at 22:05 +0100, Kaspar Landsberg wrote:
> [ wiseacresness skipped ]

Oh my god, I ask myself what you would do, if you would ever get a real
world problem.

Get a Life[tm]
--Volker

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Current PING/PONG implementation to violate the RFC
  - From: Frank Altpeter

References:
- Current PING/PONG implementation to violate the RFC
  - From: Kaspar Landsberg

Prev by Date: Re: iatuh misbehaviour
Next by Date: Re: Current PING/PONG implementation to violate the RFC
Previous by thread: Current PING/PONG implementation to violate the RFC
Next by thread: Re: Current PING/PONG implementation to violate the RFC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread