Re: Anti-collide patch

[Michal *pht* Svoboda <svobodam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Matthew Sullivan wrote:

> Michal *pht* Svoboda wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
> > 
> > > Michal *pht* Svoboda wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Joern Westermann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Kaspar Landsberg wrote:
> > > > > >
> 
> Client A = Nick Guest
> Client B = Nick Guest
> Collision!
> Client A under FNC changes to Guest2345
> Client B under FNC changes to Guest5432
> Both servers inform each other of the change. Before the FNC happens.
> Client B then gets Client A's new nick and changes to it:
> Client B Changes From Guest5432 to Guest2345
> Msg from Client A's Server indicates the new nick the FNC resulted in,
> then follows with the NICK Guest2345 message.
> Collision 2!
> Client B is killed, with no further notice.  As Client B's server has
> seen the change from Guest5432 to Guest2345 - and only cause of that
> change.
> Client A knows nothing of the second colision.
> 
this makes me get another idea, if Guest 5432 changes nick to 2345, the
server A could then FNC his 2345 to 5432 (i.e. the nick of the collider) ?

pht