[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ban bug? (easy to reproduce)



This is not a bug, 2.10 shows you the existing ban that
prevented the server from adding the ban you wanted to.

the code was added long ago to prevent redundant bans.
(it's really annoying, granted :)

On Dec 14, Tjerk Vonck wrote:
| 'lo all,
| 
| I'm on irc.sci.kun.nl 2.10.1+Cr22e1+FL4f1 aoOirw abeiIklmnoOpqrstv
| It seems there is some server side error in setting Bans. 
| 
| I set a ban
| 	/mode #channel +b *!*@*.blah.net
| 
| after that bans like
| 	/mode #channel +b *!*@*.net
| and	/mode #channel +b *!*@*.blah.blah.net
| 
| do NOT result in additional bans, instead the server returns 
| 	#channel *!*@*.blah.net
| 
| I could understand about the +b *!*@*.blah.blah.net not resulting in an
| additional ban mask, but (at least) the +b *!*@*.net should result in an
| additional ban. I of course use some obscure mIRC beta but the bug (?)
| reproduces for the ircII users that tried it as well. Is there some
| intelligence in the server code acting up? Why is it there at all?
| 
| Tjerk.