Re: registered nick?

[Ville <viha@xxxxxx>]

On Sun, 26 Jul 1998, Christophe Kalt wrote:

> On Jul 22, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> | While i basically agree with you, i do think that 'Anonymous' should be
> | blocked by the ircserver, because it gets used by the ircserver itself.

> but is it really worth it?
> if you take the anonymous nickname, you cannot do anything
> with it.

Heh.

I think this is a silly discussion.

Anonymous.. What's the use of blocking that nick? You can't even fake
anything with it. I can't possibly think of any possible abuse with it.
You can only be anonymous just like everyone else on local +a channels. ;)

Oh well, I hope I didn't miss anything.


- Ville/viha@xxxxxx